【姚海濤一包養網站比較】持之有故，言之成理，思之有得——郭沫若的荀子研討平議

requestId:6852da49c9a224.28365222.

Persistence is reasonable, and thinks is reasonable and understandable——Guo Moruo’s Xunzi Research and Discussion

Author: Yao Haibing (Qingshima Urban Academy)

Source: Author Author Authorization by Confucian Network, Original article “Guo Moruo Journal” Issue 3, 2023, No. 3, 2023

Abstract: Guo Moruo and Xunzi’s research was scattered among his many works in the 30s and 40s of the 20th century. He has been discussing Xunzi for a long time and has a high level of attention to Xunzi, producing profound results. It is a profound work studied by Xunzi of the United States, and has a rich understanding of historical research characteristics. During the Xun Research and Research, he upheld the Marxist theory, deepened the knowledge of the Xunzi Confucian school, and accurately grasped the characteristics of Xunzi’s thoughts and literary style. With a fair and objective attitude, he pointed out that both the two positions of Xun and Meng and Xun were not allowed to stand. He saw with a unique eye that one of Xunzi’s most characteristic knowledge was sexual misconduct, and put forward new ideas on the relationship between Song Zi and Xunzi. Guo Moruo and Xunzi studied and studied the Tao, and learned from him more about his own understanding, and he persisted in his reasonableness, which made him more rational. He had a lot of academic knowledge about Xunzi’s current research and study. For example, there are many discussion topics such as “The Year of the Gu Family” and Xunzi and Xunzi’s relationship with Xunzi and the relationship between Xunzi and science. The discussions of Guo Moruo and Xunzi have certain academic value, whether it is the study of the pre-Qin thinking history that evaluates Guo Moruo’s attention or the study of the contemporary Xunzi of Qidi. Keywords: Guo Moruo; Xunzi’s research; symposium;

Introduction

Guo Moruo, who is a modern writer, historian and archaeologist, has made a prominent contribution in the field of multi-school scholastic arts. If we look at the perspective of detailed academic classification, Guo Moruo’s research and development field is very broad, and his academic research and development is extensive and diverse. If we look at the perspective of continuous dissolution of the academic wall and increasing popularity of the academic subject, Guo Moruo’s research paradigm has forward-looking meanings, and is a late-stage pathfinder who interspersed with the academic research paradigm. Today, the Xunzi discussion in the academic world has become “display” and a major academic research town. Guo Moruo had a very profound discussion on Xunzi and was one of the main pioneers of Xunzi’s discussion in modern times.

1. General overview of Xunzi’s research

(I) The long-term discussion on Xunzi’s research, and the results were very impressive. When the ancients mentioned Guo Moruo’s research on Xunzi, they immediately thought of the pre-Qin academic thought history collection “Ten Batches of Reviews”, and the long article “Xunzi’s Criticism” was listed in this. This article was completed on October 31, 1944. There is no doubt that this article condenses the essence of Guo Moruo and Xunzi’s research, and is the most important result of his research. It is important to note that this article is not all discussed by Guo Moruo and Xunzi. According to the timeline, Guo Moruo’s research on Xun can be traced back to the article “The Production Age of Zhou Yi” written on March 10, 1935 [①]. “The Progress of Pre-Qin Heavenly Dao”, written on December 23, 1935, August 29, 1943 Baohao.com‘s “The Confucians of Qin and Chu”, “The Criticism of the King of Qin” written on October 3, 1943, “Research on Song Yin Wenhao” written on August 29, 1944, “A Review of the Qing Copper Age·Post Notes” written on February 20, 1944, “Criticism of the Eight Confucian Schools” written on September 11, 1944, and other works have related contents of Xunzi’s research. Because there were a large number of previous research and developments involving Xunzi, Guo Moruo naturally felt comfortable when he wrote “Criticism of Xunzi” when he wrote “Criticism of Xunzi”. It took only 16 days from October 15 to 31st to successfully complete this long article with more than 20,000 characters. After the article “Xunzi’s Criticism”, Guo Moruo’s research on Xun continued. For example, the ninth part of “Xunzi’s Criticism” written in January 1945 lists “Xunzi” ” To show the narrative of Xunzi.

Guo Moruo and Xunzi have a high degree of research, so that the famous historian Yang Zhuo wrote in 1978, “The Story of Pre-Qin History” [②], Chapter 4 of “The War of the Establishment of Feudal Corruption” “The Three of “Fethical Economy” The third part of the third part “Xun Yu and the Neo-Confucianism” under “Highlights and the Prosperity of Civilization” is used in a large number of its 1944 research results. The following quote is as follows: “It can be regarded as the last master of the pre-Qin dynasty. Xunzi not only gathered the great achievements of Confucianism, but also collected the great achievements of hundreds of schools. He has understood the differences in the academic differences of hundreds of schools. He is actually the ancestor of the country. There was almost no word in the pre-Qin period [③] without his criticism. Laozi, Zhuangzi, Shenzi, Shenzi, Qingjing, Dunxi, Mozi, etc., he said that their theories were all obscene. Even Confucian scholars themselves, such as those who were descendants of Zi Zhang, Zi Xia, and Zi You, denied “Confucianism” or “bad Confucianism”, and were even more refuted to Zi Si and Mencius. He only respected Confucius and Zigong, and he was very good at being Zigong’s private life. ”[④] Readers who are familiar with Guo Moruo’s article “Xunzi’s Criticism” can tell at a glance that its origins. According to the standards of tomorrow’s academic research, this paragraph has even reached the level of “copying”. Because it is a teaching statement rather than a special topic, it does not achieve such demands. From this, it can be seen that Yang Zhi’s praise for Guo Moruo and Xunzi’s research should not be used in this major period. This can be seen that the level of Guo Moruo and Xunzi’s research has indeed been withstood the test of time. Guo Moruo’s Xunzi discussion spanned the 30th and 40th years of the 20th century and became the main town of his pre-Qin thinking history research. Guo Moruo gradually projected the Xunzi discussion in the process of pre-Qin thinking history, and from a huge and systematic thinking history Focusing on Xunzi and understanding the perspectives gradually formed relevant theoretical research and discussion results in the detailed research and discussion process. This research thinking and method have become the main paradigm of Guo Moruo and Xunxue’s research, promoting the characteristics of his research and discussion that are both broad and insightful.

(2) The historical materialism stands for Xun’s research

Scientific criticism is rooted in the contemporary stage. Because of the increasing number of foreign civilizations, academics in TC:

【姚海濤一包養網站比較】持之有故，言之成理，思之有得——郭沫若的荀子研討平議

留言

發佈留言取消回覆

【姚海濤一包養網站比較】持之有故，言之成理，思之有得——郭沫若的荀子研討平議

留言

發佈留言 取消回覆

發佈留言取消回覆